I've
always been strongly opinionated about the fact that the sciences and arts are
split. You are only ever allowed to study one or the other. To me, it seems as
though our specialized society has become so specialized that we are expected
to only ever stay in one field of expertise. In high school, balancing all of
the regular classes and taking the classes that would either lead to a future
career or become a hobby was always very difficult. I love robotics and I am
also interested in music and arts. I had to bend head-over-heels just trying to
schedule classes because I wanted to take both band and robotics along with
required classes. Now in college there is more freedom, but not quite.
Specialization is a great thing because you can do what your best at and focus
on that, but the more advanced classes, like a music theory class, are only
available to those who are majoring in that field and no one else. Everyone
should have a hobby, an interest that they spend time on other than what they
do for work. As a computer engineering major, I love to relax by playing the
piano. I love learning more about music and find music theory to be as
interesting as all of the little details that make up a computer. Because
society wants specialized workers we are limited by expectation to choosing one
area of knowledge. But is it not the well-rounded worker who is proficient at
many skills more desirable?
Very interesting topic Michael! I would completely agree, and can sympathize as an International Relations major who wants to take some beginner photography classes and really put my hobby to use -- but these classes aren't available because its not my major! Pretty sucky situation... can't wait to see how your paper turns out!
ReplyDelete(also, some of your points that have to do with specialization reminded me of a discussion we had in our economics class... specialization can be very useful, but it is always in the producer's benefit to have eggs in many baskets!)